30 October
2002
UNITY STATEMENT OF THE PEOPLES' STREET CONFERENCE
We, the farmers, representatives of farmers organizations, peoples'
movements and civil society from throughout the Philippines and around the
world who gather here for the People's Street Conference against the Annual
General Meeting of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural
Research (CGIAR) uphold this statement of unity.
The Street Conference is an independent initiative to claim space for
critiques of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research
(CGIAR) and for the presentation of alternatives.
The CGIAR, including the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), has
consistently failed to meet the needs of poor farmers throughout the world.
From the start of the Green Revolution, the research centers of the CGIAR have
promoted a top-down, one-size-fits-all approach to research that ignores the
knowledge and experience of farmers, farming communities, and indigenous
people. The agriculture promoted by the CGIAR, with its dependence on
pesticides, fertilizers and other chemicals, is environmentally and socially
unsustainable. Farmers have been plunged into debt, their health and the health
of their families has suffered, their knowledge, culture and social systems
have been exploited, and the agro-environment of their farms has been severely
degraded.
Despite decades of effort by civil society, by farmers and farming
communities both requesting and demanding reform of the system, the CGIAR has
shown itself unable or unwilling to reform. Despite participation in
conferences, on committees, writing papers, and letters, despite interviews,
speeches, briefings and meetings, by millions of farmers throughout the world,
we do not see any significant change in the CGIAR approach. For this reason we
are forced to take to the streets.
The following issues are of particular concern to us: 1. Accountability and
governance: The CGIAR has never been accountable to whom it claims to serve.
This is reflected in its governance structure which is fundamentally controlled
by four rich countries of the North. It has never attempted to solve its
problems of accountability and continues to refuse attempts to genuinely
involve farmers' organizations in its decision-making processes.
2. The Green Revolution to the Gene Revolution: The Green Revolution
continues to cause immense damage. Far from learning from the mistakes of the
Green Revolution, the CGIAR are frantically chasing the tail of the latest
mythological 'one-technology-fixes-all:' genetic engineering. GMOs are
associated with genetic privatization through patenting and IPR; genetic
contamination; market rejection; threats to farmers' rights through increasing
monopolization in agriculture; negative health effects; environmental damage,
and a deepening of the structural inequalities between rich and poor. The
failure of the CGIAR to defend genetic diversity in the light of contamination
is disgraceful.
3. Trusteeship and biopiracy: The inability of the CGIAR to protect material
it holds in its genebanks from biopiracy is a betrayal of the trust of farmers
and farming communities. The FAO-CGIAR trust agreement has been handled
inadequately and must be fundamentally restructured. Germplasm, its components
and derivatives must be kept free of intellectual property control.
4. Worker health and safety: The relationship between CGIAR centers and the
national workforces facilitates exploitation including, in some instances,
immunity from national labor laws. Illness and death of workers,
contractualization of labor, unfair dismissals and worker harassment result.
Workers have the right to stable, ongoing, safe employment with adequate
remuneration protected by national and international law.
5. Business as usual: The ever strengthening links with the private sector
and capitulation to private sector values and agendas brings into question the
independence and integrity of the CGIAR. The stated aims of corporations (to
make money) and the CGIAR (supposedly to increase food security) are completely
different. Biopiracy, the undermining of public-oriented research agendas and a
continuing flow of knowledge and resources from the South to the North are the
result.
6. The CGIAR have grossly failed to recognize and enforce farmers' rights
despite their rhetoric.
The CGIAR has shown itself to be unable to change. The use of nice language
and pro-farmer rhetoric to clothe the same unsustainable approach does not
constitute change. For this reason and the reasons listed above, the Peoples '
Street Conference calls for a dismantling of the current international
agricultural research system and the reorientation of public funds into
responsive, pro-poor, pro-farmer, sustainable approaches.
New models of agricultural research: The work of many of the farmers,
Peoples' Organizations and NGOs attending this street conference is
illustrative of the wide range of farmer-centered research that is being
pursued throughout the world including farmer-breeding initiatives,
participative research, and the maintenance and development of community
knowledge. Farmer-led and farmer-oriented approaches, however, are chronically
underfunded, unsupported and marginalized by the mainstream approach to
research.
Call to action: It is imperative that agricultural research is
farmer-centered, farmer-led, pro-poor, and rooted in the principle of farmers
rights, genuine land reform and food sovereignty. Alternatives to the a
mainstream approach to agriculture must be strengthened and developed.
Funding for socially and environmentally sustainable agriculture must be
strengthened. We call upon donors to reorient their funding from research on
GMOs, hybrids and other damaging techno-fixes to agro-ecological, farmer led
approaches.
Public research on agriculture must be maintained free from the influence
(direct and indirect) of profit-oriented private companies. We call on all the
international scientific community to join farmers in conducting farmer-led,
farmer-oriented participatory research.
We demand that there be no patents on life or any kind of intellectual
property. The international scientific community must join peoples' movements
in explicitly rejecting patents on life, and in proactively protecting plants,
animals and agricultural processes from patents and other forms of IPR.
The international research community must work to ensure adherence to human
rights, and labor rights in accordance with all national and international
laws.
None of these demands can be achieved without the full implementation of
farmers' rights at national and international levels. The international
research establishment must recognize and advance farmers' rights in all its
policies and actions.
The current system of international agricultural research, particularly the
CGIAR, has blighted the development of responsible public science by diverting
resources and subverting knowledge, technologies and agendas. There has been a
stifling of creativity, a marginalization of farmer science and a tragic
narrowing of analysis and goals of research. We call upon ourselves, the
international scientific community, donors, and governments to start anew in
agricultural research.
Uphold People's Control on Agriculture! Assert Farmer-centered Agricultural
Research and Systems!
Signatories: 1. Peasant Movement of the Philippines/KMP
2. La Via Campesina
3. Genetic Resources Action International Network/GRAIN
4. Farmers-Scientist Partnership for Development of Agriculture/MASIPAG
(Philippines)
5. International Alliance Against Agrochemical TNCs /IAAATNCs
6. Advocates of Science and Technology for the People/AGHAM (Philippines)
7. Alliance of Farmers in Cordillera/APIT-TAKO (Philippines)
8. Assembly of the Poor (Thailand)
9. BIOTHAI (Thailand)
10. Brotherhood of IRRI Support Services Group/BISSIG (Philippines)
11. CEDAC (Cambodia)
12. Center for Environmental Concerns/CEC (Philippines)
13. South East Asia Regional Initiatives for Community Empowerment/SEARICE
14. Sibol ng Agham at Teknolohiya/SIBAT (Philippines)
15. EL KANA (Georgia)
16. Erosion, Technology, Corporation Group/ETC Group (Canada)
17. Forum for Bio-technology and Food Security (India)
18. Institute for Occupational Health and Safety Development /IOHSAD
(Philippines)
19. Patrick Mulvany, ITDG (United Kingdom)
20. Kalikasan-People's Network for the Environment (Philippines)
21. LATIN (Indonesia)
22. Pesticide Action Network Asia Pacific/PAN Asia Pacific
23. RRAFA (Thailand)
24. Peasant Movement of the Philippines-Cebu/KMP Cebu (Philippines)
25. Alliance of Farmers in Central Luzon/AMGL (Philippines)
26. Alliance of Farmers in Isabela//DAGAMI (Philippines)
27. Pesticide Action Network Indonesia/PAN Indonesia
28. Health Alliance for Democracy/HEAD (Philippines)
29. Rural Missionaries of the Philippines/RMP (Philippines)
30. National Network of Agrarian Reform Advocates/NNARA (Philippines)
31. National Fisherfolk Movement/PAMALAKAYA (Philippines)
32. Center for Genuine Agrarian Reform/SENTRA (Philippines)
|